Serveur d'exploration sur la maladie de Parkinson

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The Multiple Tasks Test

Identifieur interne : 001A86 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001A85; suivant : 001A87

The Multiple Tasks Test

Auteurs : Bastiaan R. Bloem ; Vibeke V. Valkenburg ; Mathilde Slabbekoorn ; Mirjam D. Willemsen

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47

English descriptors

Abstract

Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition (‘dual tasks’) may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural ‘components’) that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a ‘cognitive’ component (answering serial questions) from largely ‘motor’ components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (F(1,7)=2.66, P<0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task; F(1,7)=3.07, P=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task; F(1,1,7)=3.85, P=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (F(1,7)=5.90, P<0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component (‘posture first’ strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bloem, Bastiaan R" sort="Bloem, Bastiaan R" uniqKey="Bloem B" first="Bastiaan R" last="Bloem">Bastiaan R. Bloem</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: b.bloem@ion.ucl.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Valkenburg, Vibeke V" sort="Valkenburg, Vibeke V" uniqKey="Valkenburg V" first="Vibeke V" last="Valkenburg">Vibeke V. Valkenburg</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Slabbekoorn, Mathilde" sort="Slabbekoorn, Mathilde" uniqKey="Slabbekoorn M" first="Mathilde" last="Slabbekoorn">Mathilde Slabbekoorn</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Willemsen, Mirjam D" sort="Willemsen, Mirjam D" uniqKey="Willemsen M" first="Mirjam D" last="Willemsen">Mirjam D. Willemsen</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47</idno>
<date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001A86</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bloem, Bastiaan R" sort="Bloem, Bastiaan R" uniqKey="Bloem B" first="Bastiaan R" last="Bloem">Bastiaan R. Bloem</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: b.bloem@ion.ucl.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Valkenburg, Vibeke V" sort="Valkenburg, Vibeke V" uniqKey="Valkenburg V" first="Vibeke V" last="Valkenburg">Vibeke V. Valkenburg</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Slabbekoorn, Mathilde" sort="Slabbekoorn, Mathilde" uniqKey="Slabbekoorn M" first="Mathilde" last="Slabbekoorn">Mathilde Slabbekoorn</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Willemsen, Mirjam D" sort="Willemsen, Mirjam D" uniqKey="Willemsen M" first="Mirjam D" last="Willemsen">Mirjam D. Willemsen</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Gait & Posture</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">GAIPOS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0966-6362</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2001">2001</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="191">191</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="202">202</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0966-6362</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0966-6362(01)00141-2</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0966-6362</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Aging</term>
<term>Dual-task</term>
<term>Falls</term>
<term>Posture</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition (‘dual tasks’) may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural ‘components’) that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a ‘cognitive’ component (answering serial questions) from largely ‘motor’ components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (F(1,7)=2.66, P<0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task; F(1,7)=3.07, P=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task; F(1,1,7)=3.85, P=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (F(1,7)=5.90, P<0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component (‘posture first’ strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>elsevier</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Bastiaan R Bloem</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>E-mail: b.bloem@ion.ucl.ac.uk</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Vibeke V Valkenburg</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Mathilde Slabbekoorn</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Mirjam D Willemsen</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Posture</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Aging</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Dual-task</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Falls</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<abstract>Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition (‘dual tasks’) may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural ‘components’) that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a ‘cognitive’ component (answering serial questions) from largely ‘motor’ components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (F(1,7)=2.66, P>0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task; F(1,7)=3.07, P=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task; F(1,1,7)=3.85, P=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (F(1,7)=5.90, P>0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component (‘posture first’ strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8</score>
<pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>552 x 768 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>4</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>3651</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>6866</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>43519</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>534</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<pii>
<json:string>S0966-6362(01)00141-2</json:string>
</pii>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>14</volume>
<pii>
<json:string>S0966-6362(00)X0036-7</json:string>
</pii>
<pages>
<last>202</last>
<first>191</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>0966-6362</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>3</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>Journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<title>Gait & Posture</title>
<publicationDate>2001</publicationDate>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>ORTHOPEDICS</json:string>
<json:string>SPORT SCIENCES</json:string>
<json:string>NEUROSCIENCES</json:string>
</wos>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2001</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2</json:string>
</doi>
<id>011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47</id>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<extension>txt</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<extension>zip</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<title level="a" type="sub" xml:lang="en">Development and normal strategies</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<availability>
<p>ELSEVIER</p>
</availability>
<date>2001</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content">Fig. 1: Kaplan–Meier curves for the cumulative proportion of subjects with a completely Error-free performance for all motor components within each respective task of the MTT. Subjects who made an Error (Hesitation or Block) for at least one motor component of any given task were excluded from the following tasks. Errors in the cognitive component (answering serial questions) were ignored for this analysis. In both groups, 62.0% of subjects had an Error-free performance.</note>
<note type="content">Fig. 2: Kaplan–Meier curves for the cumulative proportion of subjects with a completely Error-free performance for all components (both motor and cognitive) within each respective task of the MTT. Subjects who made an Error for at least one component of any given task were excluded from the following tasks. Sixteen percent of the young controls and 30.8% of the elderly controls completed the MTT without any Errors (no significant difference).</note>
<note type="content">Fig. 3: Comparison between 20 young subjects who received the MTT in order of decreasing difficulty (most difficult task first), as opposed to the 50 young subjects described earlier who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty (simplest task first).</note>
<note type="content">Table 1: Risk factors identified in the orienting literature review</note>
<note type="content">Table 2: Fall circumstances in moderately affected patients with Parkinson's disease</note>
<note type="content">Table 3: Components selected for use in the Multiple Tasks Test are shown in the first column, while the respective tasks are shown in the top row</note>
<note type="content">Table 4: Performances for motor components within each of the eight MTT tasks</note>
<note type="content">Table 5: Performances in subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty versus subjects who received the eight tasks in order of decreasing difficulty</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<title level="a" type="sub" xml:lang="en">Development and normal strategies</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename type="first">Bastiaan R</forename>
<surname>Bloem</surname>
</persName>
<email>b.bloem@ion.ucl.ac.uk</email>
<note type="correspondence">
<p>Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Neurology, Radboud Oost, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 H13 Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-24-361-8860; fax: +31-24-354-1122</p>
</note>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<persName>
<forename type="first">Vibeke V</forename>
<surname>Valkenburg</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<persName>
<forename type="first">Mathilde</forename>
<surname>Slabbekoorn</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<persName>
<forename type="first">Mirjam D</forename>
<surname>Willemsen</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Gait & Posture</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">GAIPOS</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0966-6362</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0966-6362(00)X0036-7</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2001"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="191">191</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="202">202</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0966-6362(01)00141-2</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2001</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition (‘dual tasks’) may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural ‘components’) that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a ‘cognitive’ component (answering serial questions) from largely ‘motor’ components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (F(1,7)=2.66, P<0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task; F(1,7)=3.07, P=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task; F(1,1,7)=3.85, P=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (F(1,7)=5.90, P<0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component (‘posture first’ strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass xml:lang="en">
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>Keywords</head>
<item>
<term>Posture</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Aging</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Dual-task</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Falls</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2001-05-08">Registration</change>
<change when="2001">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: ce:floats; body; tail">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType">
<istex:entity SYSTEM="fx1" NDATA="IMAGE" name="fx1"></istex:entity>
<istex:entity SYSTEM="gr1" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr1"></istex:entity>
<istex:entity SYSTEM="gr2" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr2"></istex:entity>
<istex:entity SYSTEM="gr3" NDATA="IMAGE" name="gr3"></istex:entity>
</istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla" xml:lang="en">
<item-info>
<jid>GAIPOS</jid>
<aid>1336</aid>
<ce:pii>S0966-6362(01)00141-2</ce:pii>
<ce:doi>10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2</ce:doi>
<ce:copyright type="full-transfer" year="2001">Elsevier Science B.V.</ce:copyright>
</item-info>
<head>
<ce:title>The Multiple Tasks Test</ce:title>
<ce:subtitle>Development and normal strategies</ce:subtitle>
<ce:author-group>
<ce:author>
<ce:given-name>Bastiaan R</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Bloem</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1">
<ce:sup>a</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2">
<ce:sup>b</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="COR1">*</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:e-address type="email">b.bloem@ion.ucl.ac.uk</ce:e-address>
</ce:author>
<ce:author>
<ce:given-name>Vibeke V</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Valkenburg</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2">
<ce:sup>b</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author>
<ce:given-name>Mathilde</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Slabbekoorn</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2">
<ce:sup>b</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author>
<ce:given-name>Mirjam D</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Willemsen</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2">
<ce:sup>b</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:affiliation id="AFF1">
<ce:label>a</ce:label>
<ce:textfn>Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
<ce:affiliation id="AFF2">
<ce:label>b</ce:label>
<ce:textfn>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
<ce:correspondence id="COR1">
<ce:label>*</ce:label>
<ce:text>Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Neurology, Radboud Oost, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 H13 Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-24-361-8860; fax: +31-24-354-1122</ce:text>
</ce:correspondence>
</ce:author-group>
<ce:date-received day="25" month="4" year="2001"></ce:date-received>
<ce:date-accepted day="8" month="5" year="2001"></ce:date-accepted>
<ce:abstract>
<ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title>
<ce:abstract-sec>
<ce:simple-para>Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition (‘dual tasks’) may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural ‘components’) that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a ‘cognitive’ component (answering serial questions) from largely ‘motor’ components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (
<ce:italic>F</ce:italic>
(1,7)=2.66,
<ce:italic>P</ce:italic>
<0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task;
<ce:italic>F</ce:italic>
(1,7)=3.07,
<ce:italic>P</ce:italic>
=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task;
<ce:italic>F</ce:italic>
(1,1,7)=3.85,
<ce:italic>P</ce:italic>
=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (
<ce:italic>F</ce:italic>
(1,7)=5.90,
<ce:italic>P</ce:italic>
<0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component (‘posture first’ strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.</ce:simple-para>
</ce:abstract-sec>
</ce:abstract>
<ce:keywords class="keyword">
<ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>Posture</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>Aging</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>Dual-task</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>Falls</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
</ce:keywords>
</head>
</converted-article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<subTitle>Development and normal strategies</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA">
<title>The Multiple Tasks Test</title>
<subTitle>Development and normal strategies</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Bastiaan R</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bloem</namePart>
<affiliation>E-mail: b.bloem@ion.ucl.ac.uk</affiliation>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation>
<description>Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Neurology, Radboud Oost, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 H13 Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-24-361-8860; fax: +31-24-354-1122</description>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vibeke V</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Valkenburg</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mathilde</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Slabbekoorn</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mirjam D</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Willemsen</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001</dateIssued>
<dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2001-05-08</dateValid>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition (‘dual tasks’) may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural ‘components’) that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a ‘cognitive’ component (answering serial questions) from largely ‘motor’ components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (F(1,7)=2.66, P<0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task; F(1,7)=3.07, P=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task; F(1,1,7)=3.85, P=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (F(1,7)=5.90, P<0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component (‘posture first’ strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.</abstract>
<note type="content">Fig. 1: Kaplan–Meier curves for the cumulative proportion of subjects with a completely Error-free performance for all motor components within each respective task of the MTT. Subjects who made an Error (Hesitation or Block) for at least one motor component of any given task were excluded from the following tasks. Errors in the cognitive component (answering serial questions) were ignored for this analysis. In both groups, 62.0% of subjects had an Error-free performance.</note>
<note type="content">Fig. 2: Kaplan–Meier curves for the cumulative proportion of subjects with a completely Error-free performance for all components (both motor and cognitive) within each respective task of the MTT. Subjects who made an Error for at least one component of any given task were excluded from the following tasks. Sixteen percent of the young controls and 30.8% of the elderly controls completed the MTT without any Errors (no significant difference).</note>
<note type="content">Fig. 3: Comparison between 20 young subjects who received the MTT in order of decreasing difficulty (most difficult task first), as opposed to the 50 young subjects described earlier who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty (simplest task first).</note>
<note type="content">Table 1: Risk factors identified in the orienting literature review</note>
<note type="content">Table 2: Fall circumstances in moderately affected patients with Parkinson's disease</note>
<note type="content">Table 3: Components selected for use in the Multiple Tasks Test are shown in the first column, while the respective tasks are shown in the top row</note>
<note type="content">Table 4: Performances for motor components within each of the eight MTT tasks</note>
<note type="content">Table 5: Performances in subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty versus subjects who received the eight tasks in order of decreasing difficulty</note>
<subject lang="en">
<genre>Keywords</genre>
<topic>Posture</topic>
<topic>Aging</topic>
<topic>Dual-task</topic>
<topic>Falls</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Gait & Posture</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>GAIPOS</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="Journal">journal</genre>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">200112</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="ISSN">0966-6362</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0966-6362(00)X0036-7</identifier>
<part>
<date>200112</date>
<detail type="volume">
<number>14</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="issue pages">
<start>191</start>
<end>286</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>191</start>
<end>202</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00141-2</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0966-6362(01)00141-2</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="">© 2001Elsevier Science B.V.</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Elsevier Science B.V., ©2001</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<enrichments>
<istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47/enrichments/catWos">
<teiHeader>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<classCode scheme="WOS">ORTHOPEDICS</classCode>
<classCode scheme="WOS">SPORT SCIENCES</classCode>
<classCode scheme="WOS">NEUROSCIENCES</classCode>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:catWosTEI>
</enrichments>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A86 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001A86 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    ParkinsonV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:011ED443B27F6278B1FCF827ABB76C836E8D3F47
   |texte=   The Multiple Tasks Test
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Sun Jul 3 18:06:51 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 18:46:03 2024